You know, a bird in the hand may be better than two in the bush, but why the heck would a person have birds in their hand anyway, unless they were a falconer, a ventriloquist, or Snow White??
I can understand two birds in a bush - if they got evicted from their tree, where else are they gonna live? Plus, a bush tends to allow far more “cover” than a tree branch, against their natural predators. From a bush, you are far less likely to hear “I tawt I taw a puddy tat”, when walking by...
Incidentally, you might want to stop walking around with sunflower seeds in your hands, if you do have a problem with birds deciding to reside there. In your hand.
Chow for now...
4 comments:
Or a magician? But, yes, you do ask the tough questions! Why, indeed!
I like it better as "A bird in hand is better than two overhead" :)
I could see a beer in the hand, but a bird???
True dat! Birds overhead - never good!!
Post a Comment