Wednesday, December 07, 2011

You know, a bird in the hand may be better than two in the bush, but why the heck would a person have birds in their hand anyway, unless they were a falconer, a ventriloquist, or Snow White??

I can understand two birds in a bush - if they got evicted from their tree, where else are they gonna live? Plus, a bush tends to allow far more “cover” than a tree branch, against their natural predators. From a bush, you are far less likely to hear “I tawt I taw a puddy tat”, when walking by...

Incidentally, you might want to stop walking around with sunflower seeds in your hands, if you do have a problem with birds deciding to reside there. In your hand.

Chow for now...

4 comments:

  1. Mrs That Dan Guy10:29 AM

    Or a magician? But, yes, you do ask the tough questions! Why, indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like it better as "A bird in hand is better than two overhead" :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I could see a beer in the hand, but a bird???

    ReplyDelete
  4. True dat! Birds overhead - never good!!

    ReplyDelete